The
twentieth century comedy actor, Jimmy Edwards, once remarked, “If there was any
good advice he could give it would be, “don’t take good advice!” There’s a
message there somewhere.
A
few weeks ago, The Guardian carried
an interesting review by Susanna Rustin of a book entitled, “The Social Conquest
of the Earth” by Edward Wilson. Since I have already touched on the subject of
advice, I can tell you that the writer and atheist Richard Dawkins has advised
that we shouldn’t read it, “Potential readers should throw the book aside with
great force” he says. Should we take
such advice? What is so objectionable
about the book in the first place?
First, we should remember that back in 1976 Professor Richard Dawkins
published a book on evolution entitled “The Selfish Gene”. The premise of this book is that our genes
drive evolution, and that our genes drive us to do the things that give us most
chance of survival and of replicating those same genes. Our actions may appear to be unselfish, but
basically, the genes are driving us in one direction – the survival and
replication of our genes.
However,
the Harvard biologist and professor Edward Wilson has scientifically challenged
this rather bleak view of humanity, much to the annoyance of Richard Dawkins.
From his research, Wilson
has proposed the alternative view; he said, "I think if we can understand
who we really are then we could reach a much better world." His work and research on social insects such
as ants has led him to conclude that their high level of organisation through
close co-operation has promoted the replication of their own genes. Through
such co-operation, there has been altruistic evolution that has ensured group
survival and so these insects have become one of the most successful species on
earth.
For
Wilson , the
lives of the ants provide a lesson for humanity. He sees our own selfish striving is continually
at war with our more generous co-operative and compassionate instincts. He says it is a conflict between the poorer
and better angels of our own nature. He
warns us about the contradictions of human society, a society he says that is a
"star wars civilization with Stone Age emotions, medieval institutions and
god-like technology. We thrash about
terribly confused by the mere fact of our own existence and the danger to
ourselves and the rest of life".
But
Wilson , through
his own take on evolutionary theory offers us hope. He says, "I think we
have the qualities to come through and staunch the haemorrhage of species
extinction I just think people are capable of being better than they have been.
Why would you risk your life to save the life of a stranger? Why would you give
up one of your kidneys? We really are a wonderful species, and I think if we
can understand who we really are, then we can reach a much better world, and a
much better arrangement than we have now."
On
the other hand, Professor Dawkins has said the threat of
extinction was real and very disturbing he has stated, "Humans may be
unique in having the consciousness and ability to look into the future. Ninety
nine per cent of species have become extinct. I don't think there has been a mechanism
by which a species took steps to halt a headlong rush to extinction."
Against
the advice of professor Dawkins, to throw professor Wilson's book "aside
with great force", perhaps we might consider that Wilson’s perspective
holds out the hope for humanity that in the end our better angels can defeat
our poorer angels and that ultimately we can create a better world. These two opposing views may be dressed up in
scientific verbiage but the decision to choose hope over despair lies within
you alone, no one can think for you, you have to decide.
We struggle with the dark side our own human nature
there is uncertainty and we have to live with that. However, Psalm 23 exhorts
us to acknowledge God, to live with the faith, courage, and determination:
Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me
all the days of my life,
and I shall dwell in the house of the Lord
for ever. Amen
all the days of my life,
and I shall dwell in the house of the Lord
for ever. Amen
Our beliefs and attitudes make us who we are and will
ultimately create the world in which we live.
Thanks for this Bob, great stuff. For some reason it got me thinking of Viktor Frankl and his assertion that we are driven by a will to meaning, that we are in fact the religious meaning. He dissagreed with Freud and adler's view that we are driven by eros or power. It also brought to my mind that Native American tale...
ReplyDeleteThis is the story of “Two Wolves”
An old Cherokee is teaching his grandson about life. “A fight is going on inside me,” he said to the boy.
“It’s a terrible fight and it is between two wolves. One is evil - he is anger, envy, sorrow, regret, greed, arrogance, self-pity, guilt, resentment, inferiority, lies, false pride, superiority, ego and it makes me cynical about life.”
He continued, “The other is good – he is joy, peace, love, hope, serenity, humility, kindness, benevolence, empathy, generosity, truth, compassion, faith and it fills me with enthusiasm for life. The same fight is going on inside you – and inside every other person, too.”
The grandson thought about it for a minute and then asked his grandfather, “Which wolf will win?”
The old Cherokee simply replied, “The one you feed.”